No videogames involved in Salt Lake massacre
The Salt Lake Tribune’s Rebecca Walsh used her column to examine Salt Lake City mall shooter, Sulejman Talovic‘s motives for executing such a violent act. Walsh writes:
Others speculate that Talovic played violent video games. Attorney Jack Thompson, who is lobbying Utah lawmakers to punish those who provide games that make childÂ’s play out of murder and mayhem, sent an e-mail to reporters with the headline: “Salt Lake City Teen Probably Trained on Grand Theft Auto Video Game.” That rumor was stated as fact Wednesday on Capitol Hill.
Unfortunately, the ace-attorney’s assertions prove to be false for this particular case. GamePolitics alerts all of us that a later February 15th report on Salt Lake tribune says:
Salt Lake City police… have not discerned a motive… With the permission of Talovic’s parents, detectives searched their home but did not take any computers or video games…
There’s more confirmation on this as Salt Lake City’s Desert News reports that Police Chief Chris Burbank officially rules out video games. The report says:
For instance, detectives as of Friday had found no evidence that violent video games may have influenced Talovic. In fact, Talovic did not even own a computer or a video-game system, Burbank said.
Having said all this to you folks, we’d like to ask: Why is it that with every high-profile youth-involved act of violence, videogames are always looked at? Nevermind the ace-attorney that a lot of you would love to despise. Let’s keep him out of this. Let’s just look at the rest of the elements in the equation. Why is it that when something like this happens, videogames are always considered?
Is this telling us anything about how the gaming community conducts itself? Is this indicative of how the rest of society sees things? We’d love to hear your take on this. But, as always, please keep things civil.
Oh, and before we leave this to you folks, kudos to the SLCPD for their superb job at handling the situation.
The Salt Lake Tribune’s Rebecca Walsh used her column to examine Salt Lake City mall shooter, Sulejman Talovic‘s motives for executing such a violent act. Walsh writes:
Others speculate that Talovic played violent video games. Attorney Jack Thompson, who is lobbying Utah lawmakers to punish those who provide games that make childÂ’s play out of murder and mayhem, sent an e-mail to reporters with the headline: “Salt Lake City Teen Probably Trained on Grand Theft Auto Video Game.” That rumor was stated as fact Wednesday on Capitol Hill.
Unfortunately, the ace-attorney’s assertions prove to be false for this particular case. GamePolitics alerts all of us that a later February 15th report on Salt Lake tribune says:
Salt Lake City police… have not discerned a motive… With the permission of Talovic’s parents, detectives searched their home but did not take any computers or video games…
There’s more confirmation on this as Salt Lake City’s Desert News reports that Police Chief Chris Burbank officially rules out video games. The report says:
For instance, detectives as of Friday had found no evidence that violent video games may have influenced Talovic. In fact, Talovic did not even own a computer or a video-game system, Burbank said.
Having said all this to you folks, we’d like to ask: Why is it that with every high-profile youth-involved act of violence, videogames are always looked at? Nevermind the ace-attorney that a lot of you would love to despise. Let’s keep him out of this. Let’s just look at the rest of the elements in the equation. Why is it that when something like this happens, videogames are always considered?
Is this telling us anything about how the gaming community conducts itself? Is this indicative of how the rest of society sees things? We’d love to hear your take on this. But, as always, please keep things civil.
Oh, and before we leave this to you folks, kudos to the SLCPD for their superb job at handling the situation.